By Norma Romm
In this booklet i've got targeting drawing cognizance to numerous conceptions of responsibility that would be dropped at undergo in judging the perform of social examine. a lot of the booklet is geared up round making specific the assumptions that impression what counts as “proper” examine in society, together with assumptions approximately how social inquirers could be held dependable. My concentration is on reviewing discourses round the perform of “professional” inquiry, with a purpose to reconsidering the best way humans create expectancies for dependable social inquiry. My concentration hereon is expounded to my predicament that the way during which judgments approximately researchers’ responsibility are made, isn't with out social results for our lifestyle in society. i've got approached the problems by way of starting with a dialogue of tenets of the placement known as “positivism” (so named by means of sure proponents), and by way of contemplating the view on responsibility that's implied by means of adherence to those tenets. in brief expressed, positivist argumentation means that researchers are required to “do technology” in a fashion that warrants their being thought of, certainly, scientists. i take advantage of my dialogue of responsibility as noticeable inside positivist argumentation to explicate ways that substitute positions have arisen as methods of treating responsibility matters. via my method of evaluating some of the positions, i'm hoping to supply a few indication of the complexity ofethical and responsibility concerns in social inquiry.
Read or Download Accountability in Social Research: Issues and Debates PDF
Similar social philosophy books
Latin American Philosophy: Currents, Issues, Debates
The 10 essays during this energetic anthology movement past a only ancient attention of Latin American philosophy to hide fresh advancements in political and social philosophy in addition to techniques within the reception of key philosophical figures from the ecu Continental culture. subject matters equivalent to indigenous philosophy, multiculturalism, the philosophy of race, democracy, postmodernity, the position of girls, and the location of Latin the United States and Latin american citizens in a world age are explored via extraordinary philosophers from the quarter.
Collaborative Projects: An Interdisciplinary Study
Collaborative tasks - An Interdisciplinary examine offers study in disciplines starting from schooling, Psychotherapy and Social paintings to Literacy and anti-poverty venture administration to Social stream reports and Political technological know-how. all of the contributions are unified through use of the concept that of 'project'.
Perspectives on Ignorance from Moral and Social Philosophy
This edited assortment specializes in the ethical and social dimensions of ignorance―an undertheorized classification in analytic philosophy. individuals handle such matters because the relation among lack of know-how and deception, lack of knowledge as an ethical excuse, lack of knowledge as a felony excuse, and the relation among lack of understanding and ethical personality.
- Justice and Equality Here and Now
- Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics
- The Triumph of Venus: The Erotics of the Market (Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Rule of Law)
- On Revolution
- The Moral Equality of Humans and Animals
Extra resources for Accountability in Social Research: Issues and Debates
Example text
32). He does this by setting out to found critique on the logical implications of communicative acts ... He argues that communications involve implicit norms which require people to try to ensure that their communications are truthful, comprehensible, sincere and justifiable. (Hammersley, 1995, p. 32) But Hammersley avers that Habermas’s justification for suggesting that in the ideal speech situation certain normative rules apply, entails a circular argument — in that he The Practice of Social Science 31 presupposes that these norms must apply in genuine communicative interaction.
7 Popper’s contention is that none of the statements of science — ranging from the highest level of generality to “basic statements” about particular occurrences — should ever be considered as indubitable. Nevertheless, science can proceed because decisions can be made at certain points about whether or not to accept the statements (as tentatively corroborated). We may decide to accept them “as satisfactory, and as sufficiently tested” in the sense that we may “desist from justifying them by further arguments (or by further tests).
Secondly, values might enter the research process by researchers deciding to evaluate policies in terms of “their consistency with the ultimate values espoused by those promoting them” (Hammersley, 1995, p. 114). That is, policies can be evaluated by considering the degree to which those promoting them are indeed acting in accordance with certain espoused “ultimate values”. Thirdly, values can enter the research process by researchers “formulating policies conditionally, as the most effective and efficient means of achieving particular goals” (Hammersley, 1995, p.