By Giovanni Capoccia
How does a democracy take care of threats to its balance and endured lifestyles whilst these threats come from political events that play the democratic video game? In protecting Democracy, political scientist Giovanni Capoccia reviews key ecu international locations among global Wars I and II which survived such democratic crises.A accomplished and considerate ancient research of the democracies of interwar Europe, protecting Democracy presents a special standpoint at the many classes to be discovered from their successes and screw ups. With this completely empirical investigative process, Capoccia develops a technique for studying modern democracies -- similar to Algeria, Turkey, Israel, and others -- the place related political stipulations are current. Given the increase of terrorism and the endurance of extremism in either tested and new democracies at the present time, persevered study and discussion at the safety of democracy are useful for its renovation.
Read or Download Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe PDF
Best comparative politics books
This publication is without doubt one of the first makes an attempt to investigate how constructing international locations during the early twenty-first century have tested structures of social security (i. e. pension and poverty courses, and public healthiness and schooling structures) and the way those platforms were suffering from the hot approaches of globalization (i.
Political events are one of many center associations of democracy. yet in democracies round the world—rich and bad, Western and non-Western—there is becoming facts of low or declining public self assurance in events. In club, association, and renowned involvement and dedication, political events will not be what they was.
An in depth research of the reaction to the Yugoslav hindrance by way of one in all America's key allies in NATO. the writer makes a speciality of the query of ways a Western forms confronted as much as the main complicated overseas coverage problem of the Nineteen Nineties. The Netherlands, as a 'pocket-sized medium power', is an engaging case research.
- Gender Equality Policy in the European Union: A Fast Track to Parity for the New Member States
- The Literate Mode of Cicero's Legal Rhetoric
- Nation-Building in Turkey and Morocco: Governing Kurdish and Berber Dissent
- The National Interest in Question: Foreign Policy in Multicultural Societies
- Tocqueville: The Ancien Regime and the French Revolution
- Comparative Political Leadership
Additional info for Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe
The concluding section of each chapter classiﬁes and analyzes the defensive strategies adopted. Chapter 7 enlarges the perspective, comparing the political strategies of the border parties and the head of state in the three survival cases, on the one hand, and in Italy in 1922–26 and Germany in 1930– 33, on the other. The comparison conﬁrms the hypothesis of the importance of the decisions made by these actors for the success or failure of defensive strategies. Chapter 8 concludes by situating the ﬁndings in the context of alternative explanations of regime persistence and change in interwar Europe, discusses their wider theoretical implications, and suggests the priorities for future research in the ﬁeld.
According to the strict deﬁnition, then, antisystem parties represent an extraneous ideology—thereby indicating a polity confronted with a maximal ideological distance’’ (Sartori 1976, 133, emphasis added). Sartori’s concept of the antisystem party is thus relational in a twofold sense: ﬁrst, it involves the ideological distance of a party from the others along the political (left-right) space of electoral competition; second, it refers to the delegitimizing impact of the party’s actions and propaganda on the regime in which it operates.
The pages of the o≈cial magazine of the KB, called Die junge Front, showed a clear adherence to antidemocratic ideas (Brügel 1967). The direct o√spring of the KB, by 1934 the SHF already had close contacts with the German Nazi government, although Henlein took particular care, especially in the ﬁrst years after the foundation of the party, to conceal his antidemocratic and German-nationalist political objectives, which would become fully clear in 1937–38. 5 percent of the seats in the period analyzed here.