By Rebecca Coleman, Jessica Ringrose
Exhibits how Deleuze's philosophy is shaking up examine within the humanities and social sciencesDeleuzian considering is having an important influence on study practices within the Social Sciences no longer least simply because one in every of its key implications is the call for to collapse the fake divide among thought and perform. This booklet brings jointly foreign teachers from a number Social technology and arts disciplines to mirror on how Deleuze's philosophy is starting up and shaping methodologies and practices of empirical study.
Read or Download Deleuze and Research Methodologies PDF
Best social philosophy books
Latin American Philosophy: Currents, Issues, Debates
The 10 essays during this energetic anthology circulation past a only historic attention of Latin American philosophy to hide contemporary advancements in political and social philosophy in addition to strategies within the reception of key philosophical figures from the eu Continental culture. subject matters similar to indigenous philosophy, multiculturalism, the philosophy of race, democracy, postmodernity, the function of ladies, and the placement of Latin the US and Latin american citizens in a world age are explored by means of striking philosophers from the area.
Collaborative Projects: An Interdisciplinary Study
Collaborative tasks - An Interdisciplinary research offers learn in disciplines starting from schooling, Psychotherapy and Social paintings to Literacy and anti-poverty venture administration to Social flow stories and Political technology. all of the contributions are unified through use of the concept that of 'project'.
Perspectives on Ignorance from Moral and Social Philosophy
This edited assortment specializes in the ethical and social dimensions of ignorance―an undertheorized type in analytic philosophy. individuals deal with such concerns because the relation among lack of information and deception, lack of expertise as an ethical excuse, lack of awareness as a felony excuse, and the relation among lack of expertise and ethical personality.
- Sensibility and Sense: The Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World (St. Andrews Studies in Philosophy and Public Affairs)
- The Ideal of Equality
- After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy
- Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good
- Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine
Additional info for Deleuze and Research Methodologies
Example text
1987), ‘Translator’s Foreword: The Pleasures of Philosophy’, in G. Deleuze and F. Guattari (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London and New York: Athlone Press. Massumi, B. (2002), Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Munster, A. (2006), Materializing New Media: Embodiment in Information Aesthetics, Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England. Olsson, L. M. (2009), Movement and Experimentation in Young Children’s Learning: Deleuze and Guattari in Early Childhood Education, New York: Routledge.
Venn (2010), ‘Affect’, Body and Society, 16(1): 7–28. Bonta, M. and J. Protevi (2004), Deleuze and Geophilosophy: A Guide and Glossary, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Braidotti, R. (1994), Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory, New York: Columbia University Press. , J. Urry and K. Witchger (eds) (2010), Mobile Methods, London: Routledge. Clough, P. T. (2010a), ‘Scenes of Secrecy/Scales of Hope’, Qualitative Inquiry, 16(9): 691–6. Clough, P. T.
Hurdley, R. and B. Dicks (2011), ‘In-between Practice: Working in the “third space” of sensory and multimodal ethnography’, Qualitative Research, 11(3): 277–92. Jackson, A. Y. (2010), ‘Deleuze and the Girl’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5): 579–87 Land, C. ’ in M. Fuglsang and B. M. Sørensen (eds), Deleuze and the Social, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. , R. Holmes, C. MacRae and L. Jones (2010), ‘Animating Classroom Ethnography: Overcoming video-fear’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5): 543–56.