Le geometrie non euclidee e i fondamenti della geometria by Dario Palladino Evandro Agazzi

By Dario Palladino Evandro Agazzi

Show description

By Dario Palladino Evandro Agazzi

Show description

Read or Download Le geometrie non euclidee e i fondamenti della geometria PDF

Best geometry and topology books

Real Methods in Complex and CR Geometry: Lectures given at the C.I.M.E. Summer School held in Martina Franca, Italy, June 30 - July 6, 2002

The geometry of genuine submanifolds in complicated manifolds and the research in their mappings belong to the main complex streams of up to date arithmetic. during this region converge the strategies of varied and complex mathematical fields similar to P. D. E. 's, boundary worth difficulties, triggered equations, analytic discs in symplectic areas, advanced dynamics.

Designing fair curves and surfaces: shape quality in geometric modeling and computer-aided design

This state of the art research of the thoughts used for designing curves and surfaces for computer-aided layout purposes makes a speciality of the primary that reasonable shapes are consistently freed from unessential gains and are uncomplicated in layout. The authors outline equity mathematically, display how newly constructed curve and floor schemes warrantly equity, and support the person in settling on and removal form aberrations in a floor version with no destroying the central form features of the version.

Additional resources for Le geometrie non euclidee e i fondamenti della geometria

Example text

11 permit one to reduce various constructions and comparisons to finite models of controlled complexity. 8), (2) families of curves in M which are well-distributed in terms of arclength measure, and (3) mappings to spheres with certain estimates and nondegeneracy properties. These three kinds of information are closely linked, through various dualities, but to some extent they also have their own lives. Each would be immediate if M had a bilipschitz parameterization by Rn , but in fact they are more robust than that, and much easier to verify.

29) with respect to suitable convergence of the U ’s. The latter ensures that the limit of the minimizing sequence is actually a minimum. Note that the “obstacle” conditions that U contain the interior of Q0 and be contained in Q1 prevents the minimization from collapsing into something trivial. 29), one cannot expect much in the way of smoothness in general. 29) for a suitable choice of g. Specifically, one can take g to be a sufficiently small positive constant on ∂U , and to be equal to 1 everywhere else.

19) α(x, 2−j r) ≥ . These j’s represent the “bad” scales for the point x, and below the radius r. 15) implies that Nr (x) < ∞ for almost all x. There is a more quantitative statement which is true, namely that the average of Nr (x) over any ball B in Rd of radius r is finite and uniformly bounded, independently of the ball B and the choice of r. 20) r−d B Nr (x) dx ≤ C(n, −1 f Lip ), where C(n, s) is a constant that depends only on n and s, and f Lip denotes the Lipschitz norm of f . This is a kind of “Carleson measure condition”.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.63 of 5 – based on 15 votes