Innovation and Technology Adoption in Health Care Markets by Anupam B. Jena

By Anupam B. Jena

The 20th century introduced large advances in future health care expertise, from antibiotics to laparoscopic surgical procedure to exact treatments for cancer―but those earnings were pricey. Governments are suffering to regulate burgeoning costs with no compromising the standard of wellbeing and fitness care. more and more, those efforts have depended on "cost-effectiveness research" that balances charges opposed to sufferer merits to figure out which remedies will qualify for reimbursement.

Is using cost-effectiveness research to lead know-how adoption clever? even though compensation standards might fulfill executive future health budgets at the present time, they threaten to stifle the innovation that may generate new breakthroughs in future health care applied sciences day after today. Such standards profit present sufferers by means of reducing the price of future health care within the brief time period, yet in addition they harm destiny sufferers by way of restricting manufacturers' incentives for additional clinical innovation. builders of substances to regard HIV/AIDS, for instance, earn lifetime earnings equivalent to simply five percentage of the predicted $1.4 trillion social worth in their remedies. How can policymakers gift innovators adequately―and thereby safe the welfare of destiny patients―while making sure that present sufferers have entry to much-needed new treatments?

In this e-book, Anupam B. Jena and Tomas J. Philipson argue that extra use of cost-effectiveness research to cut down healthiness care spending might do extra damage than stable. Governments may still undertake a extra inclusive view of cost-effectiveness, one who displays not just the non permanent expenditures to sufferers but in addition the long term impression on clinical innovation. Policymakers may still supply adequate incentives for firms to boost new wellbeing and fitness care technologies―or danger a deadly scarcity of life-saving medicinal drugs sooner or later.

Show description

By Anupam B. Jena

The 20th century introduced large advances in future health care expertise, from antibiotics to laparoscopic surgical procedure to exact treatments for cancer―but those earnings were pricey. Governments are suffering to regulate burgeoning costs with no compromising the standard of wellbeing and fitness care. more and more, those efforts have depended on "cost-effectiveness research" that balances charges opposed to sufferer merits to figure out which remedies will qualify for reimbursement.

Is using cost-effectiveness research to lead know-how adoption clever? even though compensation standards might fulfill executive future health budgets at the present time, they threaten to stifle the innovation that may generate new breakthroughs in future health care applied sciences day after today. Such standards profit present sufferers by means of reducing the price of future health care within the brief time period, yet in addition they harm destiny sufferers by way of restricting manufacturers' incentives for additional clinical innovation. builders of substances to regard HIV/AIDS, for instance, earn lifetime earnings equivalent to simply five percentage of the predicted $1.4 trillion social worth in their remedies. How can policymakers gift innovators adequately―and thereby safe the welfare of destiny patients―while making sure that present sufferers have entry to much-needed new treatments?

In this e-book, Anupam B. Jena and Tomas J. Philipson argue that extra use of cost-effectiveness research to cut down healthiness care spending might do extra damage than stable. Governments may still undertake a extra inclusive view of cost-effectiveness, one who displays not just the non permanent expenditures to sufferers but in addition the long term impression on clinical innovation. Policymakers may still supply adequate incentives for firms to boost new wellbeing and fitness care technologies―or danger a deadly scarcity of life-saving medicinal drugs sooner or later.

Show description

Read or Download Innovation and Technology Adoption in Health Care Markets PDF

Best health policy books

How Fat Works

An experimental pathologist and molecular geneticist, Philip wooden makes use of gene-knockout know-how to check the way in which mouse genes control the metabolism of fat—research that offers insights into the workings of fatty-acid metabolism in people and what can occur while that metabolic stability is going awry.

Disentitlement?: The Threats Facing Our Public Health Care Programs and a Rights-Based Response

No constructed state is predicated solely at the deepest zone to finance health and wellbeing take care of electorate. This publication starts off by means of exploring the deficiencies in deepest medical health insurance that account for this. It then recounts the heritage and examines the criminal personality of America's public overall healthiness care entitlements - Medicare, Medicaid, and tax subsidies for employment-related healthiness advantages.

Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy

With present strategies calling for babies to obtain a number of doses of vaccines in the course of their first yr of lifestyles and with surprising toddler dying syndrome (SIDS) the main widespread reason for demise throughout the put up neonatal interval, you will need to reply to issues that vaccination could play a task in surprising unforeseen baby dying.

Monitoring HIV Care in the United States: A Strategy for Generating National Estimates of HIV Care and Coverage

Nearly 1. 2 million humans within the usa stay with HIV, and the quantity grows every year. In July 2010, the government published the nationwide HIV/AIDS approach (NHAS), geared toward decreasing HIV transmission, expanding entry to care, bettering well-being results, and decreasing health and wellbeing disparities for individuals dwelling with HIV.

Additional resources for Innovation and Technology Adoption in Health Care Markets

Sample text

Since the degree to which innovators can capture social surplus is crucial to dynamically efficient R&D, our findings are consistent with a potentially large underinvestment in innovation. Given our results thus far, it is useful to calculate the potential gains from future R&D and, consequently, the potential surplus that can be used to stimulate efficient levels of R&D. In particular, we ask the following question: In the current environment in which several HIV/AIDS therapies already exist, what would be the added value of a complete cure for AIDS?

Department of Health 1989). Regional health authorities, who had previously provided health care directly to the public through a system of GPs and specialists, became purchasers of care. ” At the same time, hospitals became self-governing NHS trusts that contracted with the same purchasers to become providers of health care (Woolf and Henshall 2000). For the most part, health care decisions have been made locally, at the level of health authorities and their contractors, the independent GPs—a direct result of the internal market reform, which placed more power in the hands of local purchasers and GPs.

7 With estimated survival for various cohorts infected with HIV in hand, we now turn to valuing the gains in survival. Valuing the Gains from Treatment: Results Using survival of an individual infected with HIV in 1979 as a benchmark, we use the valuation formulas described earlier to compute the lifetime value to an individual of an increase in survival to that of someone infected with HIV in a given year after 1979 (table 3-2). Aggregate values for each year are computed by multiplying that year’s incidence of HIV infection by the value of increased survival experienced by a single average individual in that cohort.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.30 of 5 – based on 21 votes